Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

FEMA processes updates and revisions to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the National Flood Insurance Program. FEMA’s statutory and regulatory authorities provide specific administrative requirements for map updates and revisions, but FEMA welcomes suggestions for improving the delivery of its program services and products. Please share your thoughts on how we could deliver these products more efficiently and in a more time effective manner.

The processing of Letters of Map Change is also an area where FEMA is committed to finding new ways to use technology to help the Agency reduce the time to process requests while maintaining the quality of the products. Please share your ideas on ways to make the process easier and more accessible without sacrificing quality.

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Improved LOMR Efficiency - Suggestions

Provide training for LOMC reviewers in order to increase the consistency among reviews. Encourage LOMC reviewers to communicate directly with LOMC submitter to discuss modeling issues and concerns. Require FEMA reviewers to provide comments based on published Guidelines and Specifications only. Do not enforce comments based on “that’s the way we’ve always done it”. Add a section to the FEMA forms to discuss ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

55 votes
56 up votes
1 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Utilize Technology to Improve LOMC Process

Incorporate LOMR mapping into NFHL as part of LOMR approval process. Regularly update NFHL. Provide current model to LOMR preparers and have them incorporate changes to the model to keep the model up to date. Making requests to find available models from the FEMA map library is tedious. A searchable digital archive of hydrologic and hydraulic models (WFS, REST end point, XML, etc…) is needed. Utilize the models ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

54 votes
56 up votes
2 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Improved LOMC Process through CTPs

The current LOMC process is too slow and reinvented every time FEMA contractors change. Encourage CTP's to take over LOMC processing. Showcase Harris County Flood Control District, San Antonio River Authority, Denver Flood Control District, Maracopa County and other CTP's that have assumed the role as LOMC processors. Encourage State Water Resource agencies to become LOMC processors even if Federal funding is needed to ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

46 votes
54 up votes
8 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

LOMR Reviewers to be More Experienced

I think many people would like the contractor’s staff to be more experienced with hydraulic modeling and knowledgeable about floodplain management. Many times with LOMR submittals we find that the person reviewing the submittal doesn’t have much knowledge. A lot of times they are recent college graduates. Too often we have to spend time responding to comments that don’t really impact the final BFE or location of the ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

38 votes
38 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Letters of Map Change - Electronic Mapping Back to Communties

When a LOMR is finalized, the community it is in is sent a letter finalizing the map change along with a small paper copy of the re-delineated floodplain boundary and affected flood profile. The community then has to scan that paper drawing and do their best to recreate the revised floodplain boundary in their own GIS system of floodplain mapping. A CAD drawing that FEMA uses to re-delineate the floodplain should be mailed ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

36 votes
37 up votes
1 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Large Scale LOMRs

There needs to be a faster mechanism for taking large scale LOMRS to effective status. Many of these involve significant community investment and interaction to get the modeling approved. Then to move into a PMR process holding pattern often causes frustration. Suggest adding an addition fee to the fee schedule to cover the extra costs of processing large scale LOMRs and then keep them as a LOMR instead of switching them ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

28 votes
30 up votes
2 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Electronic submittal of additional data

FEMA should allow electronic submittal of additional data for LOMRs (MT-2s) directly to a concerned MT-2 reviewer regardless of whether the original MT-2 request was electronic or manual. Unless a MT-2 reviewer requests additional data as hardcopy, an electronic submittal should be considered an adequate response. Eliminating a hard copy submittal to LOMC Clearinghouse would expedite the review process by eliminating ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

26 votes
26 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Revalidation Process

LOMCs revalidated during the Revalidation process are not readily accessible or searchable for the end user on the MSC website. The way the MSC is structured revalidated cases are tied to the new map panel number and then only accessible if the user knows the revalidation case number. All other LOMCs are searchable by case number through the MSC’s Product Catalog, Letters of Map Change section. To increase the visibility ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

24 votes
25 up votes
1 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Simpler LOMC forms, better guidance

LOMC forms should be simplified. The current forms are difficult to read and have many pages of instructions resulting in confusion on the part of requesters and subsequent need for more data. The addition of a simple checklist of required items for different types of requests could potentially help the requesters. Many homeowners continue to use full elevation certificates for LOMAs (which require a surveyor and ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

23 votes
23 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Expand eLOMA to reduce MT-1 Costs

FEMA may wish to consider expanding eLOMA to include more case types (i.e. LOMR-Fs, CLOMA’s, Zone A’s, etc.). This would reduce cost to FEMA by allowing licensed and certified professionals to submit MT-1 application requests online independently for a wider variety of cases. This would create a “fast track” option for applicants looking to receive a speedy determination. This option takes some of the burden off of FEMA ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

23 votes
23 up votes
0 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Expand Criteria for LOMA determinations by LIDAR

There have been a few pilot projects to issue mass LOMA or mass revalidations at a countywide scale by applying LIDAR data instead of the traditional MT-1 process . As LIDAR data becomes more accessible, implementing a standard process in which allows determinations on a defined area (e.g. 5 acres/50 lots) will save time and money for FEMAs LOMC program. By allowing a smaller area to be removed by this process, outreach ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

23 votes
25 up votes
2 down votes
Active

Campaign: Process Administration & Letters of Map Change

Automation and improving the quality of LOMR submittals

Basic LOMC training should be made mandatory for Professional Engineers/Land Surveyors wishing to submit online MT-2 requests. Online submittal should require completion of inventory checklists as a part of online LOMR (MT-2) request submittal; training should cover each item of such an inventory checklist, e.g., all the required elements of a certified topographic work map. FEMA could team up with communities and/or ...more »

Submitted by

Voting

22 votes
23 up votes
1 down votes
Active