Title might not accurately describe my idea, but basically the gist is that we provide grants to local Towns, Communities, Counties, etc, to create building ordinances that require homes built in flood prone areas be built within FEMA Codes. The grant money would be used as they see fit- whether they want to subsidize building, or put it to good use elsewhere, it's fully up to them. The point is that we would be incentivizing ...more »
Buying Down Risk with Preparedness and Mitigation
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) develops our 2018-2022 Strategic Plan, we need the input and diverse perspectives of the entire FEMA team, the stakeholders we serve, and the partners we work with every day. We need your help to inform our future vision, direction, strategic goals, and operational objectives.
The Agency is seeking feedback and engagement from our partners and stakeholders here. This is our first step in a new cycle of listening to employees at all levels, and stakeholders from state, local, tribal, and territorial governments, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector about how we could do things better.
Please feel free to comment on or discuss this topic between now and October 5, 2017.
Topic Area 2
- Provide examples of how to incentivize more investment in preparedness and mitigation prior to a disaster.
- Discuss the factors that should be included in calculating risk for awarding grants.
- Provide examples of grants that are best suited for effectively reducing risk.
- Provide examples of how the Nation, including but not limited to FEMA, can better train and credential a surge disaster workforce ahead of major disasters.
- Discuss new ways to think about a true culture of preparedness.
- Discuss opportunities to identify cost savings and reduce the complexity of mitigation and/or preparedness to build a more resilient nation
It seems that HMGP takes too long to obligate. Funds are available from day 1 of the disaster but even today, obligations are still being made for Katrina disasters. If the state can't use he money, close them down and allow the programs to move on to the next disaster. There are diminishing returns of funding mitigation 10+ years after the fact. Stick to the 1 year to submit applications and 1 year for FEMA to approve ...more »
406 Hazard Mitigation (HM) is an under-utilized tool for buying down the nation's risk. It presents an opportunity to directly reduce known risk to public facilities at a time people are most clearly faced with the impacts of disasters and the value of mitigation. Any risk reduced with 406 HM funds also supports the mitigation of undamaged properties by increasing the cap for HMGP (404) funds. 406 HM also allows FEMA ...more »
Integrate FEMA resources into existing widely used platforms at the national and local level in order to provide information to impacted communities faster, restore communities faster by generating local business and assist neighbors with search and rescue. - Work with state and local partners to communicate evacuation orders directly to personal phones through the NOAA weather alerts. - Partner with Google on their ...more »
Perspective from a tribal diplomat / technocrat / practitioner who lives on the edge of the frontier where geological hazards abound. Q: How should risk be calculated in awarding grants? A: The first weighed criteria should always be frequency of an event happening again. The second weighed criteria should be financial impact of an event happening. For example: on the coast of Washington State, windstorms happen ...more »
From a staff perspective, staff being in response and outside of grants, it appears that Grant packages are developed with FEMA assistance, but we internally do not collaborate on the applications being submitted. If we are to provide technical assistance in grant preparation, we should leverage work done in catastrophic planning and use those ideas to develop and provide grant opportunities. We also should be more ...more »
Please look at FEMA’s oversight of NFIP communities' enforcement of their flood damage prevention ordinances, especially following disasters. Communities agreed to enforce these ordinances in exchange for FEMA's flood insurance. Our flood insurance has historically paid for rebuilding damaged structures exactly the way they were before the damage even though our own insurance data and substantial damage technical assistance ...more »